These blouses are from Burda Plus Fashion Spring/Summer 2010. It's evident that these three blouses are basically the same and, except for design details, would use the same pattern pieces. The bib insert on 423 and 425 has pin tucks. One would expect those tucks to be indicated on the pattern pieces. One would think the bib insert pattern piece in 423 and 425 would have to be wider to allow for the fabric taken up by the tucks. Apparently, Burda doesn't think so. Burda has you tuck a rectangle they call a "dickey front" and the cut the pattern piece from that. Sounds reasonable, but a few years ago I made a BWOF dress with pin tucks on the cuff and a similar technique was used. I assumed (and I know what happens when we "assume") the extra length would be drafted into the pattern piece. But it wasn't. Another part of the problem was Burda's use of the term "dickey front". I defined a dickey as a false shirtfront, not whatever Burda had in mind. This made understanding the directions a bit of a challenge. I was really glad I opted out of the pintucked front.
Okay, rant is finished.
This is just the type of blouse I like wearing to work and I would like to make this blouse again in a different fabric. It would be nice to find a nice brightly colored silk. I might even try the pintucks on the bib.
aaaah, BWOF instructions. ;)
ReplyDeleteit looks awesome- love that fabric :)
Lovely blouse! Now you know it works you can make it in lots of different fabrics.
ReplyDeleteLovely. BWOF instructions get a big thumbs down
ReplyDeleteBeautiful blouse, the fabric is lovely. I totally understand the frustration with Burda at times.
ReplyDeleteBurda is still Burda. Notwithstanding, you have a lovely blouse and it is nice that you can mix and match your options for style details.
ReplyDelete